<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Joomla! powered Site</title>
		<description>Joomla! site syndication</description>
		<link>http://weareat.com</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 16:00:23 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FeedCreator 1.7.2</generator>
		
		<item>
			<title>Backporting of security fixes</title>
			<link>http://weareat.com/content/view/21/9/</link>
			<description>The term &amp;#39;backporting&amp;#39; describes when we take a fix for a security issue out of the most recent version of a product, and apply that fix to an older version. Backporting is common practice amongst software vendors such as Red Hat and is essential to ensuring that we can deploy automated updates on systems. However, backporting has not been given much attention and will be a new concept to people more familiar with proprietary software. </description>
			<category>Linux Security - Article</category>
			<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 12:51:55 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>MTI Announces 147-GB Disk Drives</title>
			<link>http://weareat.com/content/view/14/9/</link>
			<description>MTI                              Technology Corp. recently announced that its Vivant                              400 Series enterprise storage solution is now available                              with 146.8-GB disk drives. According to the company,                              the new 146.8-GB drives allow users to expand storage                              to 25.8 terabytes of data. The Vivant 400 can accommodate                              16 disk drives per 3U enclosure and 11 enclosures                              per cabinet or rack for a total of 176 drives. The                              146.8-GB drives have a rotational speed of 10,000                              revolutions per minute and yield an average seek time                              of only 4.7 milliseconds.                                                              </description>
			<category>Linux Hardware - Article</category>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 14:16:27 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Linux security strong as ever</title>
			<link>http://weareat.com/content/view/19/9/</link>
			<description>Linux                              security is as strong as ever, despite recent statistics                              that say otherwise.                              Perhaps in response to the excessive publicity given                              to the strong security associated with Linux and open                              source software, it&amp;#39;s no surprise that a number of                              commentators are making a high-profile argument that                              Linux, just like every other platform, does indeed                              have security issues. Members of the open source community                              have always known that Linux is not immune from security                              threats, so there is no argument there. What is in                              question is the final conclusion that these commentators                              are drawing, which is that Linux is less secure than                              Microsoft Windows.  </description>
			<category>Linux Security - Article</category>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 14:50:37 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
